检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]怀化市第一人民医院心胸外科,湖南怀化418000 [2]新乡医学院人体解剖学教研室,河南新乡453003
出 处:《广州医学院学报》2010年第6期72-75,共4页Academic Journal of Guangzhou Medical College
摘 要:目的:探讨经胸及经左胸腹联合行下段食管癌根治术的临床疗效.方法:回顾性分析经胸入路(34例)和经左胸腹联合入路(40例)行下段食管癌根治术患者的临床资料,术中行胸、腹淋巴结清扫,术后行病理组织学检查了解淋巴结转移情况.术后观察2周,比较2组忠者的淋巴结肿瘤转移度、手术时间、术中出血量、围手术期死亡率、并发症发生率、手术住院时间.结果:经胸与经左胸腹联合行下端食管癌根治术比较,手术时间短[(2.6 4±0.8)h vs(4.7 4±1.1)h,P〈0.05]、出血量少[(418.5 4±112.5)mLvs(693.5.4±124.8)mL,P〈0.05]、围术期并发症发生率低[5.9%(2/34)vs 22.5%(9/40),P〈0.05]、手术住院时间缩短[(15.5±4.7)dvs(24.8 4±6.5)d,P〈0.05];2组手术切除淋巴结肿瘤转移度差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05).结论:经胸行下段食管癌根治术,手术损伤小、恢复快,但远期存活率仍需观察.Objective: To investigate the outcomes of lower segment esophageal carcinoma treated with transthoracic versus transhiatal radical esophagectomy. Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 34 patients who underwent transthoracic radical esophagectomy (transthoracic group,or group A) and another 40 patients who underwent left transhiatal radical esophagectomy ( transhiatal group, or group B ) for lower esophageal carcinoma. At surgery, the patients received dissection of thoracic and abdominal lymph nodes. Post-operative pathological studies were performed to identify regional lymph node involvement. All patients were under a 2- week observation after operation. Data on lymph node metastasis, operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, perioperative mortality, complications and length of hospital stay between the two groups were compared. Results: Compared with the transhiatal group, the transthoracic group showed shorter operation time [ ( 2.6 ±0.8 ) b vs (4.7±1.1) b,P〈0. 05],less blood loss[(418.5±112.5) mLvs (693.5 ±124.8) mL,P〈0. 05],less perioperative complications [ 5.9% ( 2/34 ) vs 22.5 % (9/40), P 〈 0.05 ] and shorter postoperative hospital days [ (15.5 +4.7) d vs (24.8 ± 6.5 )d, P 〈 0.05 ]. No statistical difference in lymph node metastasis was noted between the both groups ( P 〉0. 05 ). Conclusion: Transthoracic radical esophagectomy may lead to less operation-related injury and quicker recovery sooner, although the long-term survival rate with this surgical approach is yet to defined.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117