能动司法视角下民事审判权运作机制定位与反思  

Reflection of Status of Operational Mechanism of Civil Jurisdiction:From the Perspective of Judicial Activism

作　　者：吴杰 

机构地区：[1]南政法大学,重庆401120

出　　处：《现代法学》2011年第3期135-141,共7页Modern Law Science

摘　　要：我国提倡的"能动司法"并非西方语境下的司法能动主义,也并非审判方式上的职权主义回归,同时,能动司法的目的也不在于异化法院的功能。能动司法理念的提出是为了强调司法除了被动性之外,也有积极、主动的一面,其目的在于矫正以往司法改革中单纯将司法权定位于被动、消极的倾向。在民事审判权运作机制中,有非讼程序与诉讼程序之分。能动司法的理念只有在民事审判权运作机制中加以务实分析,才能勾画出民事审判权运作机制中的司法能动与被动之思辨关系。Judicial activism promoted in China is by no means the same as in the West,nor the return of court control in adjudication.Further,the purpose of judicial activism is by no means to alienate the function of the court.The proposal of judicial activism is to stress that justice has,apart from the passive nature,positive and proactive elements,which is expected to correct the wrong idea that simply takes judicial power as passive and negative.As for the operational mechanism of civil jurisdiction,litigation and non-litigation procedural as well as jurisprudential distinction exists.As such,it is necessary for those who advocate judicial activism to have some pragmatic analyses of the civil jurisdiction operational mechanism so as to outline the relationship of the passiveness and activeness.

关 键 词：能动司法 民事审判权 职权主义 

分 类 号：DF728[政治法律—诉讼法学]