检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东师范大学,山东济南250014
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2011年第3期367-369,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究项目(08JCXLX007);国家自然科学基金项目(30570612)资助
摘 要:目的:探讨学前儿童攻击应对策略的一般特点。方法:以Kochenderfer-Ladd修订过的应对策略问卷为研究工具,通过个别访谈法考察276名3-5岁儿童在四种攻击情境下的应对策略。结果:四种攻击情境下,寻求支持和回避策略显著多于其它应对策略;回避和外化策略受攻击情境的影响;外化和问题解决策略存在显著的年龄组差异;内化策略的使用上存在显著的性别差异;受侵害者与一般儿童在同一攻击情境中所使用的应对策略存在明显差异。结论:寻求支持和回避策略是学前儿童使用最多的两种攻击应对策略,女孩较男孩更多使用内化策略,受侵害者与一般儿童相比更多使用内化与外化策略。Objective: To investigate preschool children's coping strategies with aggressive behaviors.Methods: Self-Report Coping Scale(SRCS) were used,and 276 children aged 3-6 from Jinan were interviewed to assess children's responses to four different aggressive contexts.Results: Children tended to use more escaping and social-support seeking than other strategies in all contexts.Escaping and externalizing strategies were influenced by aggressive contexts.Age difference was found in children's externalizing and problem-focused strategies,but gender difference was found in children's internalizing strategies.Coping strategies used by victims were different from normal children.Conclusion: Children tend to use social-support seeking and escaping in all aggressive contexts.Girls tend to endorse more internalizing strategies than boys.Victims favor externalizing and internalizing strategies more than normal children.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249