反思起诉书一本主义的可行性——以配套制度为视角  

Rethinking on the Feasibility of the Charge-Statement-Only Doctrine——From the Perspective of the Supporting Systems

作　　者：赵胤[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学经济法学院,上海201620

出　　处：《宁波广播电视大学学报》2011年第2期58-60,共3页Journal of Ningbo Radio & TV University

摘　　要：随着人权保障理念逐渐深入人心,刑事诉讼的人权保障价值也日益被凸显。体现英美法系当事人主义的起诉书一本主义,成为刑事诉讼改革中热议的焦点之一。然而在现实的刑事诉讼的框架下,配套制度完善的缺失,使得起诉书一本主义的仍缺乏可行性。With the concept of human rights protection gradually taking root,the value of human rights protection in criminal lawsuits is also increasingly prominent.The Charge-Statement-Only Doctrine,reflecting the adversarial system of the Common Law,has become the spotlight in the discussion of the reform of the criminal legal proceedings.However,the lack of the supporting systems under the current framework of the Criminal Procedure Law determines that it is infeasible to implement the Charge-Statement-Only Doctrine at present.

关 键 词：起诉书一本主义 可行性 配套制度 

分 类 号：D915.181[政治法律—诉讼法学]