检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王玉龙[1] 董海燕[1] 李庆[1] 袁凯[1] 陈守华[1] 付荣湛[1]
机构地区:[1]山东大学附属千佛山医院两腺外科,济南250014
出 处:《中华内分泌外科杂志》2011年第3期167-169,共3页Chinese Journal of Endocrine Surgery
摘 要:目的探讨早期乳腺癌更为合理的腋窝淋巴结处理方法,明确腋窝可疑淋巴结取样结合前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)替代单纯SLNB时的假阴性率是否明显降低,为临床应用提供依据。方法采用传统的腋窝淋巴结外科学分群方法,对符合入组条件的42例早期乳腺癌患者术前行B超引导下钩丝定位,术中行腋窝SLNB和定位的可疑淋巴结活检,再行全腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)或levelⅡ水平的腋淋巴结清扫,对SLN、可疑淋巴结、腋窝其余的淋巴结分3组行病理检查,比较单纯SLNB与SLNB配合可疑淋巴结取样活检预测腋淋巴结状态的差异。结果SLNB总成功率为100%(42/42),SLNB2例假阴性,假阴性率11%(2/18),敏感性88.9%(16/18),准确率95.2%(40/42)。SLNB配合可疑淋巴结活检预测腋淋巴结状态未见假阴性,敏感性100%(18/18),准确率100%(42/42)。结论超声引导可疑淋巴结钩丝定位取样有降低乳腺癌SLNB假阴性率的趋势,但本组样本数少,差异无统计学意义(P=0.2500)。Objective To explore ideal surgical axillary management of early breast cancer, and to determine the feasibility of reducing false negative rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) by combination of axillary suspicious lymph node biopsy and SLNB. Methods From Jan. 2008 to Oct. 2009, 42 consecutive cases with early breast cancer were enrolled. All patients underwent suspicious node hook-wire location by doppler ultrasonography before operation. SLNB and suspicious lymph node biopsy were performed during operation. Complete axillary nodes dissection (ALND) or level Ⅱ dissection would be conducted according to the biopsy result. The difference of node status prediction between SLNB and SLNB with axillary suspicions lymph node biopsy and was compared. Results All the 42 cases successfully underwent SLNB (100%). There were 2 false negatives occurred in SLNB, resulting in false negative rate of 11% , sensitivity of 88.9% and accuracy of 95.2% in predicting axillary nodes status. By contrast, SLNB with axillary suspicious node biopsy showed a false-negative rate of 0% , sensitivity of 100% , and accuracy of 100%. Conclusions Compared to SLNB in early breast cancer, combination of suspicious node biopsy and SLAB has a tendency of reducing false negative rate. However, Because of the limited samples, the difference has no statistical significance (P = 0. 2500).
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117