检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国地质大学学报(社会科学版)》2011年第3期92-97,共6页Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:以CNK I搜集到的186篇有关生态传播研究的论文为研究对象,发现该研究领域十分有限的研究成果既无体系化的理论,也无成熟的分析方法,仅仅是新闻传播理论的一个应用领域。但许多该领域的研究者却在呼吁建立一门新闻传播学的分支学科——生态传播学。这种在没有学科的内容之前就先规定学科的形式和边界的做法,在我国学界是相当常见的。这种观念通常基于某些研究主体两种不同意识的共同推动:其一是希望通过学科的建立来提升社会的重视;其二是通过界定学科边界的方式获得自己的资源和利益。不管哪种意识,其结果都是让生态传播研究陷入到内容空洞的学科幻象中。Based on the systematic analysis of 186 academic theses regarding ecology communication studies on CNKI as the research object,this paper reveals that the research results are quite limited in communication ecology studies,lacking not only systematic theories but mature analytic methods,and this research field is no more than an application field of news and communication theories.Yet,so many researchers in this field are passionately appealing for establishing the discipline of ecology communication—a branch subject of news and communication studies.It is fairly common in China's academic circles that the form and boundary of a discipline often come first even before the discipline's content comes into being.Two kinds of motives of some researchers make contributions to this concept.Most important,they hope to enhance their social status via the establishment of this discipline.And then they could acquire resources and interests by defining the boundary of this discipline.No matter what kind of motive,the ecology communication studies would get lost in endless yet hollow academic illusion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229