中国美学主干说商兑  

A Debate with the Theory of Chinese Aesthetic Mainstream

作　　者：王进[1] 

机构地区：[1]广州大学人文学院中文系,广州510006

出　　处：《晋阳学刊》2011年第3期68-72,共5页Academic Journal of Jinyang

摘　　要：中国美学史上儒家与道家何者为主干一直争论不休,各种理论主张站在偏狭和片面的立场上扬己抑人,究其原因是论争各方用凝固和僵化的观点看待历史文化现象。文章对于三教合流的文化脉络进行了全面的梳理,提出了"文化妥协论"的基本观点,并以此为基本理论支持,对人们习以为常的"儒家美学主干说"进行了商兑,提出了"学派无主干,根基有共识"的论点。认为儒家与道家在两千多年的动态发展进程中逐步达成了文化的共识。It has long been disputed whether Confucianism or Daoism constituted the mainstream of the history of Chinese aesthetics.However,both sides of the dispute approached the issue from a provincial and one-sided perspective,which is largely due to their treatment of the cultural-historical phenomenon as something fixed and essentialized.By delineating the confluence of Confucianism,Daoism and Buddhism,this paper puts forward the idea of ＂cultural reconciliation,＂ based on which it challenges the commonly-accepted theory that deems Confucianism as the mainstream,and further argues that there is agreement instead of mainstream in the history of Chinese aesthetics.Through two thousand years of dynamic development,Confucianism and Daoism had gradually achieved a cultural agreement.

关 键 词：中国美学史 儒家与道家 文化妥协论 文化共识 

分 类 号：B83-05[哲学宗教—美学]