检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘福泉[1]
出 处:《唐都学刊》2011年第3期63-68,共6页Tangdu Journal
基 金:国家社科基金一般项目(09BFX081)
摘 要:韩国民事执行威慑机制以债务人财产明示制度、不履行债务者名单制度、债务不履行之损害赔偿制度和债务人财产照会制度为主要内容,集中体现了"以债权实现为中心、兼顾程序利益保障"的基本理念。韩国的经验为我国民事执行威慑机制的完善提供了诸多启示:在制度形式上,应以增强条文的确定性和可操作性作为首要任务;在制度内容上,在加强执行威慑功能的同时,还要兼顾当事人程序利益之保障。The system of coercion determent in the ROK,which is mainly composed of the reporting property,the roster of non-fulfillment,the damages for non-fulfillment,and the note of debtor's property,intensively embodies the basic notion,namely,centred around the fulfilling of debt and giving consideration to ensuring the procedural interest.The ROK's experience leaves behind some enlightenment to the perfection of the system of coercion determent in China: in terms of its form,priority should be given to the enhancement of the certainty and operability of provisions;in terms of its content,it is necessary to strengthen its determent function,but also to take into account the protection of the procedural interests of the parties.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145