检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]辽宁医学院口腔医学院口腔种植中心,辽宁锦州121001 [2]辽宁医学院口腔医学院口腔修复科,辽宁锦州121001 [3]辽宁医学院口腔医学院牙周病门诊,辽宁锦州121001
出 处:《辽宁医学院学报》2011年第3期193-195,I0001,共4页Journal of Liaoning Medical University (LNMU) Bimonthly
基 金:辽宁省自然科学基金项目;编号:20092186
摘 要:目的观察微创术不翻瓣技术在口腔种植术中的临床效果,为患者提供简便、舒适和经济的修复方式。方法选择82例牙槽脊骨量充足的患者应用不翻瓣口腔种植技术,另82例患者采用常规翻瓣技术作为对照组。同期植入种植体,观察手术时间、患者术后疼痛反应情况和药物应用情况。结果微创不翻瓣种植技术修复效果与传统方式无差别,但在手术时间、术后患者痛苦程度、软组织肿胀程度及术后用药时间上均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。结论微创不翻瓣技术较常规翻瓣种植手术给患者带来的痛苦小,可大大节省手术时间,降低术后反应,获得更满意的临床效果。Objective To observe clinical effects of minimally invasive flapless technique's in dental implant placement, and to provide a simple, comfortable and economical method for dental patients. Methods 82 patients with sufficient quantity of alveolar bone were selected to use minimally invasive flapless technique, and other 82 patients were selected as control group by using regular techniques. Implants were placed to the patients of the two groups at the same time, and operating time, postoperative reaction and medication were evaluated. Results The restoration effect between minimally invasive flapless technique group and control group was almost the same, but there were significant statistic differences in operating time, pain degree of patient after surgery, soft tissue swelling, and medication time between the two groups ( P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusion Compared with techniques used in the control group, minimally invasive flapless technique can minimize patient's pain degree, saving operating time, diminish postoperative reactions, and gain more satisfactory restoration results.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.63.240