我国管理学研究中的测量模型误设及仿真分析  

A Critical Review and Simulation Analysis of Measurement Model Misspecifications in Chinese Management Research

作　　者：王念新[1,2] 仲伟俊[1] 梅姝娥[1] 

机构地区：[1]东南大学经济管理学院,江苏南京21009 [2]江苏科技大学经济管理学院,江苏镇江212003

出　　处：《管理工程学报》2011年第2期109-117,共9页Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(70671024);教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(10YJC630242);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20070286008);江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学研究基金(2010SJB630020)

摘　　要：在实证研究中,构念和观测变量之间的关系经常被忽视。本文详细区分了反映式测量模型和构成式测量模型,通过分析我国管理学领域的三本学术刊物2002年到2007年以结构方程模型(SEM)为数据分析工具的实证研究论文,发现我国管理学研究中测量模型误设的情况普遍存在。蒙特卡罗仿真分析表明,测量模型的误设将导致相关路径系数的被显著扩大或缩小,而且可能导致Ⅰ型错误和Ⅱ型错误。由于现有的SEM软件不能处理构成式测量模型,本文提出了模型细化法和模型分解法,能够将构成式测量模型转换成反映式测量模型。Structural Equation Modeling（SEM） is a prevalent research method in the Chinese management study.SEM can be divided into measurement models and structural models.A well-specified measurement model is a prerequisite to analyzing the structural model.Reflective and formative measurement models are two different measurement models.Measurement model misspecification has been a serious problem in the fields of Marketing,Organizational Behavior,and Management Information Systems.Measurement model misspecification can lead to invalid research results.Many approaches can facilitate the internationalization and normalization of SEM in Chinese management studies.These approaches include the discussion of the difference between reflective and formative measurement models,analysis of measurement model misspecification problems,and investigation of the consequence of measurement model misspecification problems.In the first part,we discuss major differences between reflective and formative measurement models.Measurement models include reflective and formative measurement models.In the reflective measurement model,constructs are treated as causes of measures,and the measures are reflective manifestations of underlying constructs.In the formative measurement model,measures are specified as causes of constructs,and the measures represent underlying latent variables.Reflective and formative measurement model can be further distinguished by various features.We discussed these features from the perspectives of hierarchism,causality,correlation between measures,deletion of measures,and measurement errors.In the second part,the current status of measurement model misspecification problems in Chinese management studies was analyzed.We chose 315 published papers from three top Chinese management journals between 2002 and 2007.All these studies used SEM as their analytic tool.A total of 315 measurement models,consisting 314 reflect measurement models and 1 formative measurement model,were identified.Among all measurement models,111 m

关 键 词：结构方程模型 测量模型误设 反映式测量模型 构成式测量模型 仿真 

分 类 号：F270[经济管理—企业管理]