不同旱养模式对微山麻鸭生产性能与水质污染的影响  

Effects of Different Dry-feeding System on Laying Performance and Water Pollution in Weishan Ma Ducks

作　　者：李桂明[1,2] 曹顶国[1,2] 黄保华[1,2] 雷秋霞[1,2] 韩海霞[1,2] 李福伟[1,2] 周艳[1,2] 刘涛[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东省农业科学院家禽研究所,山东济南250023 [2]山东省家禽育种工程技术研究中心,山东济南250023

出　　处：《中国家禽》2011年第12期15-17,共3页China Poultry

基　　金：山东省良种工程项目(2009LZ014-02);沿湖地区农业面源污染防控与综合治理技术研究项目(2007BAD87B05)

摘　　要：选取健康、体重差异不显著的产蛋期微山麻鸭800只,自由采食与饮水,常规免疫与饲养管理。以人工模拟的水池为对照组,另设喷淋、深水槽、纯旱养3种旱养模式作为试验组,每组设置5个重复,每个重复40只鸭。试验结果表明:深水槽组日采食量显著高于纯旱养组(P<0.05),其余各组之间所有生产性能指标差异均不显著(P>0.05);不同旱养模式之间蛋形指数与蛋壳强度差异不显著(P>0.05);3个戏水组(水池、喷淋、深水槽)蛋壳厚度均显著高于纯旱养组(P<0.05);喷淋组在所有蛋品质指标中均表现出明显的优势;除纯旱养组外,喷淋组水源利用与污染减排的综合效益最佳。综合生产性能、蛋品质、水质污染等指标,本试验中喷淋组得到了最佳综合效果。800 healthy Weishan Ma ducks whose body weight were non-significant in laying period were selected in the study. Immunization and feed were according to routine. Artificial ponds （AP） served as controls,showing group （SG）,deep water tank （DWT）,only drink water （ODW） were experiment groups,every group was divided into 5 replicates of 40 ducks. Results showed that,DWT daily feed intakes improved remarkably compared with ODW （P0.05）,all the other performance were not significant （P0.05）;egg shape index and shell strength among all the groups were not significant. Shell thickness in other three groups improved remarkably compared with ODW （P0.05）,SG achieved a distinctadvantage over the others on egg quality. Besides DWT,SG were the best choose on water utilization and environment benefit. Considering performance,egg quality and water pollution,SG were the best choose in this trial.

关 键 词：旱养 微山麻鸭 生产性能 蛋品质 水质污染 

分 类 号：S828.32[农业科学—畜牧学]