检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵亚杰[1]
机构地区:[1]吉林省委党校,吉林长春130012
出 处:《行政与法》2011年第6期67-69,共3页Administration and Law
摘 要:公益诉讼在西方法制健全的国家中发展得比较完善,已被广泛接受且已成了较为成熟的司法制度。在我国,由于特殊的国情导致了我国对公共利益的保护存在许多漏洞,同时,传统的诉讼理论在应对国有资产流失案件中存在着缺隐,使许多涉及国有资产流失的案件无人主张权利,无法进入司法的管辖和监督。为了有效地对国有资产进行司法保护,需要突破传统的诉讼理论,运用公益诉讼制度。因此,有必要对运用公益诉讼制度解决国有资产流失问题的价值进行分析。Public interest litigation in the Western countries have developed a sound legal system more perfect,is widely accepted that the formation of a more mature county judicial system.In China,due to exceptional circumstances led to the protection of public interests in China there are many vulnerabilities,the same time,the traditional litigation theory in response to the loss of state assets,there is lack of hidden cases,many cases involving the loss of state assets does not claim rights,can not Into the jurisdiction of judicial supervision.In order to effectively carry out the judicial protection of assets,you need to break through the traditional litigation theory,the use of public interest litigation.Therefore,it is necessary to use public interest litigation to resolve the value of the loss of state assets for analysis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229