检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宫凤玲[1] 杨冬生[1] 于鹏[1] 张惠英[1] 陈伟彬[1] 李盖[1]
机构地区:[1]华北煤炭医学院附属医院,河北唐山063000
出 处:《中国临床医学影像杂志》2011年第5期321-323,共3页Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging
摘 要:目的:评价256层螺旋CT分步组合后处理技术在右膈下动脉(RIPA)成像中的价值。方法:对98例患者行腹部双期增强扫描,其中肝细胞癌12例,分别用A组:多平面重组(MPR)+最大密度投影(MIP);B组:MPR+容积再现(VR);C组:MPR+曲面重组(CPR)3种不同后处理组合方式观察RIPA。结果:98例患者的RIPA均能显示,A组对于RIPA起源及大体解剖的显示高于B组和C组,具有显著统计学差异(P<0.01)。结论:MPR+MIP分步组合后处理技术能很好的显示RIPA,可以作为经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)术前准确评估其参与肝细胞癌肝外供血首选的无创性检查手段。Objective: To evaluate the value of combined different postprocessing techniques using 256 slice spiral CT for the visualization of right inferior phrenic artery(RIPA).Methods: Double-phase contrast enhanced scan was performed in 98 patients including 12 cases of HCC to observe RIPA using three different postprocessing combination techniques.The cases were divided into three groups: Group A(MPR+MIP),Group B(MPR+VR),and Group C(MPR+CPR).Results: The ability of showing the origin and distribution of RIPA in Group A was higher than those in Group B and Group C.Conclusion: MPR+MIP postprocessing techniques can display distribution of RIPA clearly,which can be used as a first choice and accurate noninvasive examination method to evaluate the extrahepatic blood supply in preoperative TACE of HCC.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.219.31.133