走向刑事宪法?——以宪政框架下的法国刑事诉讼改革为背景  

Towards a Criminal Constitution?——Referring to the Reform of the French Criminal Procedure in the Frame of Constitution

作　　者：施鹏鹏[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学诉讼法与司法改革研究中心

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2011年第6期60-68,76,共10页Zhejiang Social Sciences

摘　　要：自2000年以来,宪法与刑事诉讼之间的微妙关系因频繁的刑事诉讼改革以及公民个案违宪审查权的创设而成为法国学术界最炙手可热的问题。刑事程序的合宪性规制技艺、内容设定以及效力范围均成为讨论的重中之重。法国宪法委员会在宪政框架下确保了刑事诉讼改革中的"公正优先,兼顾效率",构建了宪法与刑事诉讼法较为良性的互动。从比较法的角度看,法国的做法在欧洲大陆职权主义国家具有普适性。中国当下可能很难短时确立违宪审查机制,但可考虑在刑事诉讼法中确立序言性条款,允许法官在刑事诉讼法存有漏洞或与基本人权相冲突的情况下直接援引序言条款予以排除适用。Since 2000,the relationship between the Criminal Procedure and the Constitution has attracted the attention of many French scholars for the frequent reforms and the creation of Question Prioritaire de Constitutionnalité..The hot topics include the control techniques of Constitution,contents and effects.The conseil constitutionnel establish a principle in the reform of the criminal procedure,i.e.,equity first,efficiency next.Accordingly,the constitution and the criminal procedure interact well in France.In the view of comparative law,the French model is all-pervading on the European Continent.We can not immediately establish a complete system of constitutional justice like France.However,a transitional system may be available,i.e.,we can introduce a series of preliminary principles in the criminal procedure law in China.The judges can exclude some clauses by reason of the violation of essential rights or apply these principles for the lacuna.

关 键 词：法国 宪政 刑事诉讼 关系 借鉴 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]