痰液癌胚抗原、癌抗原125、糖链抗原19—9和细胞角蛋白21—1片段检测对肺癌的诊断价值  被引量:2

Diagnostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen, cancer antigen 125, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and cytokeratin 21-1 fragment assays of sputum in patients with lung cancer

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:刘大鹰[1] 胡灼君[1] 农天雷[2] 林敏[2] 

机构地区:[1]广西壮族自治区柳州市柳铁中心医院呼吸内科,545007 [2]广西壮族自治区柳州市柳铁中心医院核医学科,545007

出  处:《中国医师进修杂志》2011年第19期4-8,共5页Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine

基  金:广西壮族自治区柳州市科技局基金(2009021525)

摘  要:目的检测痰液中癌胚抗原(CEA)、癌抗原125(CA125)、糖链抗原19—9(CA19-9)和细胞角蛋白21—1片段(CYFRA21—1)的含量,探讨痰液中肿瘤标志物检测在肺癌诊断中的意义。方法采用化学发光免疫分析法检测52例肺癌(肺癌组)和46例肺部良性病变患者(对照组)痰液中CEA、CAl25、CA19—9和CYFRA21.1的含量。结果肺癌组痰液中CEA、CA125、CA19—9和CYFRA21—1的含量分别为(27.6±31.2)μg/L、(76.4±65.2)kU/L、(56.1±31.6)kU/L和(25.2±9.1)μg/L;对照组分别为(6.1±7.5)μg/L、(23.7±7.9)kU/L、(17.3±10.2)kU/L和(1.2±1.7)μg/L,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。肺癌组痰液中CEA、CA125、CA19—9和CYFRA21—1的敏感度分别为42.3%(22/52)、46.2%(24/52)、36.5%(19/52)和51.9%(27/52),四种肿瘤标志物单项在肺癌中的敏感度比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。腺癌CEA阳性率高于鳞癌(χ2=4.193,P〈0.05),CYFRA21—1阳性率低于鳞癌(χ2=4.806,P〈0.05)。III期+Ⅳ期肺癌患者CAl25的阳性率较I期+Ⅱ期高(r=5.202,P〈0.05)。痰液中单项肿瘤标志物的检测阳性率不高,含CYFRA21—1的两项、三项、四项检测组合阳性率明显提高(P〈0.05)。结论检测痰液中肿瘤标志物CEA、CA125、CA19—9和CYFRA21—1对肺癌的诊断具有一定的意义,联合检测痰液肿瘤标志物获得更高的阳性率和准确度,对肺癌的诊断具有较高的实用价值。Objective To evaluate the clinical significance of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA125),carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and cytokeratin 21-1 fragment (CYFRA21-1) assays of sputum in patients with lung cancer. Method Fifty-two cases with lung cancer and 46 eases with benign lung diseases underwent detection of CEA, CA 125, CA 19-9 and CYFRA21-1 in sputum by using the method of chemi-luminescent enzyme immunoassay. Results The levels of CEA,CA125, CA19-9 and CYFRA21-1 in sputum of 52 cases with lung cancer were (27.6± 31.2) μg/L, (76.4 ± 65.2) kU/L, (56.1± 31.6 ) kU/L and (25.2 ± 9.1 ) μg/L respectively. But the levels of those of 46 eases with benign lung diseases were (6.1±7.5)μg/L, (23.7 ±7.9) kU/L, (17.3 ± 10.2) kU/L and (1.2 ± 1.7)μg/L respectively. The levels of these tumor markers in sputum in patients with lung cancer were significantly higher than those in patients with benign lung diseases(P 〈 0.01 ). The diagnostic sensitivity of CEA, CA125, CA19-9 and CYFRA21-1 in sputum in 52 cases with lung cancer was 42.3%(22/52) ,46.2%(24/52) ,36.5% ( 19/52 ) and 51.9% (27/52) respectively (P 〉 0.05 ). Among the cancer patients, the sensitivity of sputum CEA in patients with adenoeareinoma was significantly higher than that in patients with squamous cell carcinoma(χ2 = 4.193, P 〈 0.05 );while the sensitivity of sputum CYFRA21-1 in patients with squamous cell carcinoma was significantly higher than that in patients with adenocarcinoma ( χ2 = 4.806,P 〈 0.05 ). The sensitivity of CA 125 in advanced lung cancer( III + IV stage) was higher than that in early lung cancer( I + II stage) ( χ2 = 5.202,P 〈 0.05 ). Compared with the single tumor marker assaying, the combination of CEA, CA125, CA19-9 and CYFRA21-1 in sputum could significantly improve the sensitivity and accurate value in the diagnosis of lung cancer (P〈 0.05). Conclusion To assay CEA,CA125,CA19-9 and CYFRA21-1

关 键 词:肺肿瘤 肿瘤标记 生物学  诊断 

分 类 号:R734.2[医药卫生—肿瘤]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象