检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭如青[1]
出 处:《江苏大学学报(社会科学版)》2011年第4期66-70,共5页Journal of Jiangsu University(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:从批评话语分析的视角,采用Scollon&Scollon提出的语篇系统分析模型,就中美社论中的"我们/WE"进行探讨,结果表明:意识形态方面,中美社论存在群体取向的"集体化声音"和自主取向的"个性化声音"之差异;社会化方面,中美社论语篇分别体现出个人顺应环境以及环境顺应个人需要的特征;语篇形式方面,前者偏好含蓄委婉的间接交流方式,后者倾向于开门见山的直接交流方式;而面子系统上,前者重视群体面子,采用独立策略或参与策略,后者则注重个人面子,采用参与策略。The use of the first person plural "我们/WE" in both Chinese and American editorials is analyzed from the CDA perspective and within the analytical framework of Discourse System proposed by Scollon Scollon.It is found that,ideologically,there is a difference of group-oriented "collectivized voice" and self-oriented "individualized voice";in terms of socialization,there is a distinction between individuals' adaptation to environment or environmental adaptation to individuals;and in form of discourse,Chinese editorials prefer to be indirect while American ones prefer to be indirect;in the case of face system,Chinese editorials attach immense importance to group face,using either independent or involving strategy accordingly while American ones emphasize individual face and often employ independent strategy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.26