检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京理工大学人文与社会科学学院,江苏南京210094 [2]江苏省知识产权局,江苏南京210008
出 处:《南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2011年第2期30-35,共6页Journal of Nanjing Tech University:Social Science Edition
摘 要:我国现行《专利法》对职务与非职务发明创造的界定不清及专利权统归单位所有的制度设计存在诸多缺陷与不足,一定程度上偏离了保护专利权人的合法利益、鼓励发明创造的立法宗旨。分析对比国内外有关职务发明创造专利权权利归属的相关立法,建立发明人优先、当事人意思自治优先的专利权权利归属制度,明晰和简化构成职务发明的要件理应成为我国专利法律制度的完善路径。The existing Patent Law in China has many defects and limitations in the definition of patent right of service and non-service inventions as well as the system of patent belonging to the unit,to some extent deviating from the legislative purpose of protecting the legal interests of patentees and encouraging inventions and creations.Therefore,measures must be taken to perfect patent legal system by analyzing and comparing the relevant laws both at home and abroad about the right adscription of service inventions,establishing right adscription system of patent right which gives priority to the inventors and priority of party autonomy to the concerning parties,as well as clarifying and simplifying the elements constituting service inventions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222