检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]辽宁医学院口腔系,锦州121000 [2]山东省泰安市第二人民医院精神科,泰安271000 [3]武警总医院口腔科,北京100039
出 处:《国际口腔医学杂志》2011年第4期474-477,共4页International Journal of Stomatology
摘 要:粘接固位种植冠桥较螺丝固位舒适、美观,更易获得被动就位,临床应用较多;然而,在日后维修、发生食物嵌塞和种植体周围炎等并发症需要取下修复体进行治疗时,其牙冠较难完整拆卸;因此,在粘接固位种植冠桥中,如何不损伤种植体及其上部结构而又能方便地取下修复体,即义齿的可拆卸性,一直是研究的热点。以往有关粘接固位种植冠桥可拆卸性的研究归结起来可分为机械装置和选择合适的粘接材料2种,本文就以上2种方法在临床可行性方面作一综述。Compared to screw-retained restorations,cemented implant-retained restorations have been widely used due to esthetic,comfort and passive fit.To retrieve cemented restorations from implants is not easy for subsequent maintenance and treatment of complications such as peri-implant inflammation or food impaction.It is always a hot topic of retrieval,that is,how to remove cemented implant-retained restorations conveniently without damage.Two methods of removing cemented implant restorations have been reported in the literature,including removable mechanical components and choose proper cement.This review would briefly introduce the above two methods in clinical feasibility.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3