检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沈志民[1]
出 处:《河北法学》2011年第7期120-125,共6页Hebei Law Science
摘 要:受托者非法占有封缄物行为应如何定性,对此一直存在较大争议。在受托者占有说、委托者占有说、区别说、修正的区别说等诸学说中,区别说具有合理性,即封缄物的整体归属受托者占有,而封缄物的内容物归属委托者占有。因此,行为人非法获取封缄物整体的行为应认定为侵占罪,而非法获取封缄物的内容物的行为则构成盗窃罪,同时,对何物是封缄物需做严格解释。How to define the bailee's act of unlawful possession of sealed object,there has been considerable controversy on that.Among the various theories,such as possession of the bailee,the bailor possession,the doctrine of discrimination and the amendments of it,the doctrine of discrimination,that the possession of whole sealed object belongs to the bailee,and the inside contents of sealed objects are still under the bailor's possession,is more reasonable.Therefore,the act of illegally obtaining the overall sealed object shall be identified as embezzlement,the act of illegally access to the contents of sealed object shall be identified as theft.Meanwhile,the concept of sealed object shall be under strict interpretation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.97.68