论律师伪证罪的立案启动与规制完善  

On the Trigger Mechanism and Regulation of Attorney Perjury

作　　者：王永杰[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院 [2]中国政法大学

出　　处：《社会科学》2011年第7期96-104,共9页Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：2010年教育部一般项目"律师伪证罪相关问题研究"(项目编号:10YJA820108)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：律师伪证罪立案启动制度的理论基础有三:宪政精神是立案启动制度的最根本性因素,刑事政策是立案启动制度的基准性因素,启动主体享有较大的自由裁量权是立案启动制度中最活跃的因素。我国律师伪证罪立案启动制度的特征有二:一是本土色彩浓重,二是立案渠道单一。本罪立案启动机制的缺陷有三:强制措施方面存在问题;立法上的抽象导致立案启动的随意性;本罪的立案启动容易形成犯罪嫌疑人、被告人口供认罪——律师介人——犯罪嫌疑人、被告人翻供——律师妨害作证(或伪造证据)——立案启动的生成模式。目前我国的立案启动制度存在着诸多问题,应从以下方面来完善:完善管辖制度与回避制度,引入司法审查制度,要确立法院对公安机关行为的指挥与监督,相关沉默权制度的建立,以及创设"辩护人非暴力犯罪"的强制措施豁免制度。The trigger mechanism on the register and the investigation of attorney perjury is basted on three theories, among which constitutional spirit is the most fundamental one, criminal policy is the benchmark factor and the subject has large discretion is the most active factor. There are two features about the trigger mechanism of attorney perjury, which are the localization feature and the single channel. There are mainly there defects on the trigger mechanism, which are the compulsory measures, the ab- stractness of legislation leading to arbitrary start mechanism, and the crime is easy to form the following mode, that is the conviction of the criminal suspect or defendant - lawyers participate in litigation - confession of the criminal suspect or defendant - lawyer hamper the testimony or forgery - register. At present there are many problems with the trigger mechanism of our country. Especially the crime subject is lawyers. So we must improve our litigation procedure before the amendments made to the substantive law, to achieve the legislative purposes when the crime was created. I suggest to improve the jurisdiction system and avoiding system, introducing the judicial censorship and create the exempt system of ‘nonviolent crime of defenders＇.

关 键 词：律师伪证罪 立案 启动 完善 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]