诉讼构造与程序时效:英美法系审前缺席审判的理论基础——兼论我国不宜建立审前缺席审判  

Litigation Structure and Procedural Prescription:Theoretical Basis ofCivil Pretrial Default Judgment in Common Law System——Simultaneously dealing with unsuitability of establishing pretrial default judgment in China

作　　者：刘秀明[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南科技大学法学院,四川绵阳621010

出　　处：《河北法学》2011年第8期161-168,共8页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：西南科技大学博士研究基金"民事缺席审判制度研究"(10ZX7149)

摘　　要：缺席审判制度有其存在的程序正当性,英美法系缺席审判的特点在于规定了审前的不应诉判决。这与对抗主义的诉讼模式、二元制的诉讼构造和程序时效制度存在着密切的联系。无论从诉讼价值、诉讼程序的纵向构造,还是从比较法等视角来看,我国不宜建立审前的缺席审判制度。Defauh judgment has its value of due process. The default judgment in Anglo-American law system is characterized by pretrial default judgment. This system design has close connection with adversary procedural mode, binary structure and institution of procedural prescription. It is not available for establishing default judgment in Chinese pretrial procedure whether through procedural value, longitudinal structure of procedure or comparative perspective.

关 键 词：缺席审判 民事诉讼 审前程序 理论基础 制度借鉴 

分 类 号：DF71[政治法律—诉讼法学]