检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:苗丽[1] 郑振恒[1] 郭岩岩[1] 洪红光[1] 谢玉萍[1]
出 处:《中华神经医学杂志》2011年第7期700-704,共5页Chinese Journal of Neuromedicine
摘 要:目的分析不同放射剂量γ-刀治疗对功能性泌乳素(PRL)腺瘤的PRL水平的影响,判断PRL在γ-刀治疗功能性PRL腺瘤预后和指导激素替代治疗的作用。方法回顾性分析山东淄博万杰医院和广东深圳罗湖人民医院自2004年9月至2008年3月应用γ-刀治疗的248例功能性PRL腺瘤患者的临床资料,按治疗剂量将患者分组:Ⅰ组:50Gy≤中心剂量〈60Gy;边缘剂量:20~30Gy;Ⅱ组:40Gv≤中心剂量〈50Gy;边缘剂量:15~25Gy;Ⅲ组:30Gy≤中心剂量〈40Gy;边缘剂量12~20Gv;术前、术后1月、3月、12月采用放射免疫法检测患者血清PRL水平,术后1年、2年复查头颅MRJ观察肿瘤大小的变化。结果3组患者术前PRL水平的差异有统计学意义(P〈0.051,与Ⅰ、Ⅱ组比较,Ⅲ组PRL值偏低,术后12个月与Ⅰ组比较,Ⅲ组PRL值偏高;与术前相比,3组患者术后PRL水平均降低,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);术后1年MRI显示肿瘤缩小198例f80%);术后2年肿瘤消失203例(82%),增大19例(7.7%),无变化26例(10.4%)。结论不同剂量γ-刀治疗功能性PRL腺瘤对术后内分泌的恢复有很大的影响,中心剂量和边缘剂量(尤其是中心剂量)较高时,术后PRL易恢复正常。但远期是否会造成垂体低功需要长期随访。Objective To analyze the effects ofT-knife treatment with different dosages on level of prolactin (PRL) in patients with different sizes of functional pituitary prolactinomas, and determine an index to guide hormone replacement therapy and the prognosis of 3-knife treatment in patients with functional pituitary prolactinomas through comparing the changes of tumor sizes and the levels of PRL before and after γ-knife treatment. Methods A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 248 patients with functional pituitary prolactinomas was performed; gamma knife treatment was performed on these patients from September 2004 to March 2008. We divided the patients into 3 groups: group Ⅰ (50 Gy〈central dose〈60 Gy, 20 Gy〈marginal dose〈30 Gy), group Ⅱ (40 Gy ≤ central dose〈50 Gy, 15 Gy〈marginal dose〈25 Gy) and group III (30 Gy〈central dose〈40 Gy, 12 Gy〈marginal dose〈20 Gy). The irradiation dose on optic nerves in the 3 groups was under 9 Gy. Radioimmunoassay was employed to detect the serum PRL level before and 1, 3 and 12 months after γ-knife treatment. The changes of the tumor sizes were observed and compared with cranial MRI 1 and 2 years after γ-knife treatment. Results Significant differences on the PRL level were noted before γ-knife treatment between each 2 groups (P〈0.05); the PRL level in group Ⅲ was lower as compared with that in group I and II before γ-knife treatment; however, the PRL level in group Ⅲ was higher as compared with that in group Ⅰ12 months after γ-knife treatment; the PRL level in all the 3 groups after γ-knife treatment was significantly lower as compared with that before γ-knife treatment (P〈0.05). MRI showed that the tumor had 80% partial response rate (198/248) in the 1st year, 82% complete response rate (203/248) in the 2rd year, increased volume in 19 patients (7.7%) and no change in 26 patients (10.4%). Conclusion Different treatment doses of Gamma knife on functional pituitary prolactinomas has great
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.226.159.125