检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙文兵[1] 丁雪梅[1] 高君[1] 柯山[1] 王劭宏[1] 孔健[1]
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院肝胆外科西区,北京100043
出 处:《中华肝胆外科杂志》2011年第7期534-538,共5页Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(30872490);北京市卫生系统高层次卫生技术人才培养项目(2009-311);吴阶平医学科研基金资助项目(320.6750.07131)
摘 要:近十多年来,射频消融(RFA)治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效不断提升,已成为早期HCC常用的治愈性手段。但是RFA在我国的开展尚不普遍,疗效也有待提高。本文从外科视角,对提升HCCRFA疗效的技术性措施进行了较系统的阐述,包括明确癌灶部位和范围、把握适应证和禁忌证、科学应用预治疗、合理选择RFA路径和经皮穿刺路径的引导方式、选择合适的射频电极、充分镇痛、保证充分的消融边界、优化消融策略、积极预防和诊治并发症、准确判定完全消融、规范随访、重复应用RFA治疗局部肿瘤进展和肝内复发病灶共13项,旨在为在我国进一步推广该技术提供规范和参考。Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been recognized as a curative therapeutic modality for hepatocellu- lar carcinoma (HCC) for its increasing efficacy in the recent more than ten years. However, RFA has not been generally carried out in our country and the efficacy still waits for im- provement. This paper presents a systemic discussion on the technical measures to promote the efficacy of RFA for HCC from the surgeonrs perspective, aiming to provide technical standard and reference for the further popularization and ap- plication of RFA in China. The 13 measures include clarifi cation of the tumor location and extent, following the indica- tions and contraindications of RFA, scientific application of pretreatments, selection of the best approach of RFA and of the reasonble guiding method for pereutaneous RFA, selec-tion of suitable RFA probe, adequate analgesia, sufficient ablative margin to guarantee pathological complete ablation, optimization of ablaiton strategy, active prevention, diagnosis and treatment of complications, correct evaluation of complete ablation, standadized follow-up and selection of RFA to treat the local tumor progression and intrahepatic occurrence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222