轻伤害案件中特异体质介入的刑法分析——以中日立法·判例·学说比较为视点  

Analysis on the Intervention of Idiosyncrasy in Light Injury Cases-Comparing of the Legislation,Precedents and Doctrine between China and Japan

作　　者：武良军[1] 

机构地区：[1]海南大学,海南海口570228

出　　处：《湖南公安高等专科学校学报》2011年第3期68-74,共7页Journal of Huan Public Security College

基　　金：海南大学"211工程"建设专项经费资助

摘　　要：对特异体质介入的轻伤害事案的分析,可以归结于特异体质介入下的刑法因果关系的认定和行为人是否应对加重结果即被害人死亡存在过失这样两个方面。在因果关系的认定上,较判例一贯采取的条件说之立场,折中的相当因果关系说更具妥当性。此外,从责任主义的角度出发,肯定行为人对加重结果即被害人死亡存在过失,也应当是合理的。最后,从我国刑法第264条对故意伤害致人死亡的罪刑配置来看,既有的司法实践做法不利于被告人人权的保障,故而亟待改变。The analysis of the intervention of idiosyncrasy in light injury cases can be attributed to two aspects： the identification of the cause-and-result relationship of the criminal law with the intervention of Idiosyncrasy and whether the actor is guilty of the aggravating result,namely the victim＇s death.First of all,a compromise Causality Theory is more appropriate than the commonly-used Theory of Condition.In addition,from the perspective of responsibility doctrine,it is also reasonable to define that the perpetrators is guilty of the death of the victim.Lastly,from the allocation and configuration of intentionally hurt death crime in article 264 of the Criminal Law in our country,the existing judicial practice is detrimental to the rights of the defendant,so it must be changed.

关 键 词：特异体质 因果关系 加重结果 过失 

分 类 号：D924.34[政治法律—刑法学]