检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:翟宏丽[1,2,3]
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学校医院 [2]中国政法大学法学院卫生法研究中心 [3]证据科学教育部重点实验室(中国政法大学)
出 处:《证据科学》2011年第3期307-317,共11页Evidence Science
摘 要:由于医疗活动的高度专业性,因而在医疗纠纷诉讼中存在证据偏在、医患武器不平等严重问题。证据协力义务是居于"准确"、"公正"、"和谐"、"效率"等的价值基础,其在医疗纠纷诉讼中的适用具有正当性。建议通过医疗机构的阐明病历义务,对证人、鉴定人违反证据协力义务的制裁,证人拒绝提供证言权等规范来弥补医疗纠纷诉讼中证据协力义务的结构性缺失,以增加医疗纠纷诉讼中证据协力义务规范的可预测性。Because of the specialty of medical profession, there exist serious problems in the medical mal- practice litigations, such as the emphasis on severity of the evidence and the inequality of arms between the medical institution and patient. There are some elementary values such as "exactness", "righteousness", "harmo- ny" and "efficiency" in the cooperation obligations to provide evidence in the medical malpractice litigations , as well as justice in its practice. The: paper suggests to make up for the structural defaults in the cooperation obliga- tions to provide evidence in the medical malpractice litigations by such measures as explaining medical records and punishing the witnesses and expert witnesses who fail to fulfill such cooperation obligations ,thus increasing the predictability of legal norm of the cooperation obligations to provide evidence in the medical malpractice litigations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117