检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:叶正明[1]
机构地区:[1]湖南工学院思想政治理论教学科研部
出 处:《证据科学》2011年第3期338-344,共7页Evidence Science
基 金:国家社科基金项目"药品安全立法及其损害救济制度比较研究(09CFX037)"。
摘 要:在美国产品严格责任制度中,药品具有缺陷是药品侵权责任成立的前提条件。在涉及药品责任的诉讼中,对药品缺陷的证明是决定诉讼胜败的关键。"美国第三次侵权法重述"把药品缺陷分为设计缺陷、制造缺陷、使用说明或警示缺陷。其各自不同的判断标准,既能帮助原告理解抽象的缺陷概念,也为原告通过具体的证据去证明缺陷指明了方向。探讨美国药品缺陷判断与证明的法律理论以及判例经验,以期能对我国相关法律的建设与司法实践提供一些有益的参考。Drug with defects is a precondition for the establishment of drug tort liability in the United States where a strict product liability system is adopted. In a drug liability litigation, the drug being proved to have de- fects is essential to determine whether the action wins or not. According to the Third Restatement of Torts, drug defects are divided into manufacturing defect, design defect, usage instruction or warning defect, and their respec- tive judgment standard not only helps the plaintiff to comprehend the abstract concept of the defect ,but also di- rects the plaintiff to prove defects by concrete evidences. This paper aims, by studying the American judgment and proof of drug defect, to provide some help for China to construct its relevant law and set up its judicial practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200