对后危机时代最后贷款人法律制度创新的思考  

On the Innovation of the Lender of Last Resort Theory in Post-crisis Era

作　　者：黎四奇[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南大学法学院,湖南长沙410082

出　　处：《财经理论与实践》2011年第4期124-128,共5页The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics

基　　金：国家社科基金项目<后危机时代问题金融机构处置法律制度完善研究>(11BFX051)

摘　　要：无论一种制度如何先进,与动态的社会而言,其都是一个此一时彼一时的问题。若具有相对真理性的制度意图"常青不败",那么它就必须与时俱进。虽然古典的最后贷款人制度实现了既定史命,但是金融自由化、金融电子化与国际化已从另一侧面检测着该制度的精致或拙劣。是急流勇退,还是迎难而新,这是后危机时代该制度因时而化中所必须权衡的重大问题。However a system is developed, compared with the dynamic society, it changes with the times. If a system wants to have long vitality, then it should keep up with the time. Though the classic Lender of last resort theory is of great meaning, however, the liberalization and internationlization of finance have challenged the system. To he innovative or not to be, it is a problem in the post-crisis era.

关 键 词：后危机时代 金融安全 最后贷款人制度 

分 类 号：F832.31[经济管理—金融学]