检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]清华大学法学院,北京100084 [2]中央民族大学法学院,北京100081
出 处:《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》2011年第4期11-16,共6页Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
摘 要:以班轮公会集体收取码头作业费事件为代表的航运垄断和限制竞争行为破坏了我国航运市场的竞争秩序,损害了中国货主的利益。但我国现有规则却无法从根本上构建起足以支撑航运业发展的有效竞争法律体系,需要制订能够规制航运业垄断行为的航运反垄断规则。航运反垄断规则应当采用与现有《反垄断法》相接轨的框架和内容来制定,应当单行于我国正在制订的《航运法》中,且作为《航运法》的核心部分,其基本架构包括实体和程序两部分。考虑到航运业的国际性以及由此衍生的垄断问题的国际性,在坚持该法域外效力的同时,也需以国际协作维持国际航运市场秩序、保护我国货主利益。Shipping monopoly hampered the free and fair competition in Chinese shipping market and infringed the Chinese shippers' interests. Existing shipping competition related rules may not frame a holistical regulatory system and have led to a regulatory dilemma against illegally competitive conducts in the shipping market. China calls for a systematic framework of shipping competition rules. In terms of rule-construction, shipping competition rules should be legislated as the core of China's Shipping Law while complying with the framework of China's Antimonopoly Law. In terms of the content, shipping competition rules shall consist both substantive and procedure rules. In terms of the application scope, shipping competition rules shall apply to the anti-competitive conducts within China as well as those outside of China which adversely affect China's domestic shipping market.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249