检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京大学光华管理学院
出 处:《金融学季刊》2011年第1期77-98,共22页Quarterly Journal of Finance
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(基金号:70873003)资助
摘 要:本文在Diamond(1991)模型中引入抵押品,研究企业信誉对企业债权融资工具选择的影响。主要结论有:(1)大型企业债权融资的可获得性不受其信誉水平影响;(2)中小型企业只有达到抵押贷款市场的信誉门槛,才能获取债权融资;(3)银行甄别成本足够低时,中小型企业只会选择抵押贷款、信用贷款与信用债券三种债权融资工具。本文的模型能够解释Diamond(1991)无法解释的实证结论,并为国内中小型企业债权融资难问题的解决方向提供政策建议。This paper examines the effect of enterprise reputation on enterprise's debt finan- cing instrument selection by introducing collateral into Diamond ( 1991 )'s model. Our basic results are as follows: (i) Large enterprises can always get debt financing aside from their reputation levels; (ii) SMEs(small and medium-sized enterprises) can get debt financing only when their reputation are beyond the minimized requirement for entering into mortgage loan market; (iii) SMEs would raise finance from mortgage loan, unsecured loan or debenture bond market when the screen- ing cost of bank is low enough. This model can explain the empirical results that Diamond ( 1991 ) can't. It also provide some policy suggestions for solving debt financing difficulties of China's SMEs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171