检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张杰[1] 高子童[2] 刘旭峰[1] 黄志平[1] 朱填莉[1] 张茜如[1]
机构地区:[1]第四军医大学心理学教研室 [2]中国人民解放军71305部队医院
出 处:《山西医科大学学报》2011年第7期542-544,550,共4页Journal of Shanxi Medical University
摘 要:目的探讨不同颜色视标对黑背景色的认知绩效差异,为丰富色彩认知工效学理论和人-机界面工效设计提供颜色对比的实践依据。方法采用简单反应时(SRT)研究范式,120名视觉正常的本科生完成10种颜色视标相对黑色背景随机变换的认知测验。结果①在黑色背景下,被试对不同颜色视标反应时间不同,有统计学差异(F=6.658,P<0.001);②与黑背景色间的颜色距离不同,反应时间有统计差异(F=6.868,P<0.001);③反应较快的前四种颜色视标依据所占的人数比例依次为黄色(18.8%)、白色(17.9%)、绿色(15.2%)、青色(10.7%);④反应较慢的三种颜色视标依据所占的人数比例依次为蓝色(20.5%)、淡紫色(18.8%)、粉色(15.2%)。结论对于黑色背景,不同颜色视标的反应速度不同;视标与背景色间的颜色距离对反应时有明显的影响,即随着颜色距离的增加,反应时表现出渐慢的趋势;同一颜色的反应时存在个体差异。Objective To discuss the cognitive performance differences of different color targets on black background for perfecting color cognitive ergonomics theory and providing a color contrast practice basis for human-machine interface efficiency design. Methods Using simple response(SRT) research paradigm,120 visual normal undergraduates finished the cognition test for random transform of 10 color visual targets on black background. Results ①In the black background,the reaction time for different color visual targets was different,and there was statistically significant(F=6.658,P0.001).②When color distance was different,reaction time was different(F=6.868,P0.001).③The top four colors that people reacted faster were yellow(18.8%),white(17.9%),green(15.2%)and cyan(10.7%).④The color that people reacted slower was blue(20.5%),lilac(18.8%),pink(15.2%). Conclusion For the same black background,the reaction time for different color visual targets was different.Color distance from visual target to background has a significant impact on reaction time.The longer the color distance is,the shorter the reaction time is.There was individual differences for the same color.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.81