检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]首都师范大学心理学系,学习与认知重点实验室,北京100048
出 处:《心理科学进展》2011年第8期1126-1137,共12页Advances in Psychological Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(30970891);北京市教委项目(KM201110028022);教育部博士学科点基金(20091108110001)支持
摘 要:面孔信息的分类方法一直复杂多样,相关研究数据丰富,但所用概念混杂。构形加工与特征加工作为使用最频繁的分类方法,其可靠性越来越受研究者们关注。从近40年来的相关文献中选择引用率高的文献做参考,遵循不同研究方法相互印证的原则分析数据,提出构形加工与特征加工的区分是面孔识别中重要并且可靠的加工类型划分,但确认两者在知觉加工上的先后关系以及在个体发展上的先后顺序尚缺乏稳定一致性的实验依据。Configural and featural processing, two were reviewed based on literatures frequently cited conceptions and methods were discussed, and the most important processing modes in face recognition, and supported during recent 40 years. Different related findings supported both by behavioral and cognitive neuroscience researches were emphasized and systematically interpreted under a frame of dissociated facial recognition. Developmental and neurobiological studies were further reviewed to provide a robust evidence of two processing modes in facial recognition. Furthermore, the potential different levels of configural processing were proposed to explain the conflicted conclusions in the field. Whatever, the distinction between configural processing and featural processing was well supported, and these two processing pattern may be used to account for how we obtain different facial property information from one's faces. Still, the subcategory of configural information and the differences between conceptions such as configural, holistic, whole, and global were suggested to be explored in the future.
分 类 号:B842[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200