检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南开大学附属口腔医院 [2]天津市口腔医院修复科,天津300041 [3]武汉大学口腔医学院修复科
出 处:《口腔医学研究》2011年第7期628-629,632,共3页Journal of Oral Science Research
摘 要:目的:调查精细印模法增强下颌全口义齿吸附作用的临床效果。方法:对30名无牙颌下颌牙槽嵴条件较差患者用精细印模法和传统印模法取印模,并制作完成全口义齿。义齿戴入3个月后对下颌全口义齿固位功能、黏膜情况,舒适性、咀嚼功能、食物嵌塞等内容进行临床调查。结果:两种印模法完成的下颌全口义齿在舒适程度、黏膜情况、食物嵌塞方面无显著性差别;但在咀嚼功能、固位功能方面精细印模法组明显好于传统印模法组(P<0.05)。结论:精细印模法优于传统印模法,普遍适用于下颌牙槽嵴条件差的患者。Objective: To observe the clinical effects of fine impression and traditional impression on the adsorption of mandible complete denture. Methods: 30 patients who were edentulous in mandible or with inferior alveolar ridge were treated with two methods of complete denture impression, and their dentures were prepared and completed. After wearing dentures, their retaining funtion, mucosa, comfort, masticatory function and food impaction con- tents, were compared. Results: There was no significant difference between two groups in the aspects of comfort, mucosa and food impaction. While in the aspects of masticatory and retaining function, fine impression was superior to traditional impression(P^0.05). Conclusion: Fine impression was superior to traditional impression, and may be applied to patients with inferior alveolar ridge or mucosa in mandible.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40