检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨文华[1] 赵宝莲[1] 孙庚林[2] 吴炜[2] 周健[2]
机构地区:[1]天津市北辰医院口腔科,300400 [2]天津市医科大学总医院口腔颌面外科
出 处:《实用口腔医学杂志》2011年第4期495-500,共6页Journal of Practical Stomatology
基 金:天津市北辰区科研立项(编号:2009-1)
摘 要:目的:用有限元法分析比较下颌骨颏部正中骨折小型钛板二维与三维坚强内固定的稳定性。方法:用ANSYS软件建立下颌骨颏部正中骨折坚强内固定模型,比较使用不同钛板数目、不同空间位置进行坚强内固定时各种工况下骨折段位移、骨折断层及接骨板固定钉的应力分布情况。结果:各种固定方法在各种功能咬合工况下,骨断端位移均小于0.15 mm,三维固定时骨折断端的位移均小于二维固定。各种固定时骨折断层和接骨板固定钉的应力分布均在允许值范围内。结论:下颌骨下缘下方骨面钛板加唇颊面钛板的三维固定方法在多数工况下优于传统二维内固定方式。Objective: To compare the effects of two-and three-dimensional internal fixation of mandibular symphysis fracture using three-dimensional finite element method.Methods: ANSYS software was used to build three-dimensional finite element model of mandibular symphysis fracture and the two-and three-dimensional fixation for the fracture.The displacement of fractured fragments,stress distribution on the fracture fault and fixation pin were analysed on the model.Results: With various fixation methods under the occlusal conditions,the stress distribution was in the clinically acceptable range,the displacement of fractured fragments was less than 0.15 mm.Three-dimensional fixation resulted in less displacement.Conclusion: Three-dimensional fixation is superior to two-dmensional fixation for the immobilization of mandibular symphysis fracture.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.90.244