采用QUOROM声明和MOOSE规范评价中文期刊发表的眼科Meta分析类论著  

Appraisal of meta-analysis manuscripts on eye diseases published in Chinese journals with QUOROM statement and MOOSE guidelines

作　　者：朱明明[1] 邹海东[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学附属第一人民医院眼科,200080

出　　处：《中华眼科杂志》2011年第8期732-737,共6页Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology

摘　　要：目的评价近10年来中文期刊发表的眼科Meta分析类论著撰写的规范化水平。方法电子检索维普、万方、中国期刊全文数据库及中国生物医学文献数据库，并辅以手工检索，纳入2000年1月至2010年9月间中文期刊公开发表的眼科Meta分析类论著，排除译文、重复发表论著等。根据QUOROM声明和MOOSE规范中的要求进行逐条评价。结果共检索得到50篇眼科Meta分析类论著。根据QUOROM声明要求，发现32篇随机对照试验的Meta分析类论著中仅有8篇（25．0％）公布了Meta分析的流程图，18篇（56．3％）进行了敏感性分析，9篇（28．1％）进行了偏倚评估。对照MOOSE规范要求，发现18篇观察性研究的Meta分析类论著中仅6篇（33．3％）有完备的检索策略，4篇（22．2％）进行了敏感性分析，8篇（44．4％）进行了偏倚评估。结论中文期刊公开发表的眼科Meta分析类论著撰写的规范化仍待提高。（中华聪群杂志，2011，47：732．737）Objective To assess the standardization of meta-analyses reports on eye diseases published in Chinese journals in recent ten years. Methods Meta-analyses manuscripts on eye diseases published in Chinese-language journals from January 2000 to September 2010 were retrieved through the following databases ： Wanfang Data, VIP Information, CNKI and Chinese Bio-medicine Database, along with manual database search. The manuscripts translated from foreign-language meta-analyses reports or repetitive publications were excluded. All enrolled manuscripts were then analyzed item by item according to the checklist of QUOROM statement and MOOSE guidelines. Results 50 manuscripts were finally enrolled into the present quality appraisal study, including 32 meta-analyses manuscripts of randomized control trail （RCT） studies and the other 18 recta-analyses manuscripts of observational studies. Out of the 32 manuscripts evaluated with QUOROM statement, only 8 （25.0%） manuscripts included flow chat describing the process of selection, 18 （56. 3% ） manuscripts included sensitivity analyses and 9 （28. 1% ） included bias evaluation part. Out of the 18 manuscripts evaluated with MOOSE guidelines, only 6 （ 33.3% ） included comprehensive relative literatures search strategy, 4 （22. 2% ） included sensitivity analyses and 8 （44.4%） included bias evaluation section. Conclusion The standardization of recta-analyses reports on eye diseases published in Chinese journals needs to be improved. （Chin J Ophthalmol, 2011,47：732-737）

关 键 词：META分析 写作 手稿 医学 

分 类 号：GG[医药卫生] R