检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李建荣[1]
机构地区:[1]安徽财经大学财政与公共管理学院,安徽蚌埠233041
出 处:《南阳理工学院学报》2011年第3期117-120,共4页Journal of Nanyang Institute of Technology
基 金:安徽财经大学研究生科研创新基金项目(ACYC2010CL020)
摘 要:有关社会保障"私有化"的争论由来已久,但是对于"私有化"本身的概念和内涵的界定不清导致有人简单地将私有化和"商业化"这两个概念等同看待。这不仅是对私有化概念本身的误解,重要的是这种思想大行其道势必会对社会保障制度造成严重的威胁和灾难。本文试图澄清这些概念,以期对社会保障制度的实施提供参考和理论支持。The debating of Social Security "privatization" has a long history, but for the concept and meaning of "privatization" was not clearly defined, some people simply think the two concepts Privatization and " commercialization" are equal. This is not only the misunderstanding of the concept Privatization itself moreover it will also inevitably pose a serious threat and disaster to the social securi- ty system if this kind of the idea go popular. This article attempts to clarify these concepts, therefore it provide reference and theoretical support to the implementation of the social security system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249