机构地区:[1]中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院病理科细胞学室,100021
出 处:《中华肿瘤杂志》2011年第8期621-625,共5页Chinese Journal of Oncology
摘 要:目的探讨表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)、survivn和异质性胞核核糖蛋白A2和B1(hnRNPA2/B1)在肺癌纤维支气管镜刷片细胞学诊断中的价值。方法收集纤维支气管镜刷片细胞学临床诊断剩余标本197例,免疫细胞化学两步法(Envision)染色,检测EGFR、survivn和hnRNPA2/B1在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)、小细胞肺癌(SCLC)及非肺癌组织中的表达情况。结果EGFR、survivn和hnRNPA2/B1在NSCLC中表达率分别为81.1%、66.2%和90.9%,在非肺癌组织中的表达率分别为30.3%、3.3%和66.7%,差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0.05);hnRNPA2/B1在SCLC表达率为92.3%,与非肺癌组织比较,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。EGFR的表达与肿瘤分化程度、淋巴结转移和TNM分期有关(P〈0.05),hnRNPA2/B1表达与TNM分期有关(P〈0.05)。NSCLC和非肺癌组织中,EGFR和survivn共同表达的差异有统计学意义(98.0%和2.0%,P=0.000),EGFR和survivn均不表达的差异亦有统计学意义(38.2%和61.8%,P=0.000)。结论EGFR、survin和hnRNPA2/B1在肺癌纤维支气管镜刷片细胞学诊断中有较高的敏感性和特异性。EGFR与survivn联合应用可以提高细胞学诊断的准确性。EGFR阳性表达与肺癌患者的预后有关。Objective To study the expression of EGFR, survivn and hnRNPA2/B1 proteins in ThinPrep bronchial brushing cytology specimens and their significance in diagnosis of lung cancer. Methods The protein expression of EGFR, survivn and hnRNPA2/B1 was detected by immunocytochemistry (ICC) in the specimens from 110 cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) , 32 cases of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and 37 cases of non-neoplastic lung lesions. The relationship between EGFR, survivn and hnRNPA2/B1 protein expression and clinical characteristics of the patients was analyzed using SPSS 16.0 software. Results (1) Positive expression was observed in 81. 1% of NSCLC for EGFR, 66.2% for survivn, 90.9% for hnRNPA2/B1, significantly higher in NSCLC than in the control specimens (P = 0.000, P = 0. 000, P = 0. 010). The positive expression rate of hnRNPA2/B1 in SCLC was 92.3%, significantly higher than that in the control specimens ( P = 0. 021 ). ( 2 ) The expression of EGFR was associated with differentiation ( P = 0. 003 ), clinical stage ( P = 0. 023 ) and lymph node metastasis ( P = 0.038), but was not associated with gender, age and histological types. The survivn expression was not related with the above mentioned clinicopathological features ( P 〉 0.05 ). Expression of hnRNPA2/B1 was associated with clinical stage (P = 0.017 ), but not associated with gender, age, histological type, differentiation and lymph node metastasis. (3) There was a significant difference between the co-expression of EGFR and survivn in NSCLC (98.0%) and benign conditions (2.0%, P =0. 000), also a significant difference between the negative expression of both EGFR and survivn in NSCLC (38. 2% ) and nonneoplastic lesions (61.8% , P = 0. 000). Conclusions Analysis of EGFR, survivn and hnRNPA2/B1 expression may be an useful adiunct method to stratify controversial cases. The positive expression of EGFR might be associated with invasion, progression and poor prognosis of NSCLC.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...