检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中央民族大学医院,北京100081 [2]北京东平口腔门诊部,北京100089
出 处:《现代生物医学进展》2011年第16期3105-3107,共3页Progress in Modern Biomedicine
摘 要:目的:比较富士Ⅱ玻璃离子与普通玻璃离子充填材料修复楔状缺损的临床疗效。方法:58例患者324颗楔状缺损患牙随机分为2组,分别用富士Ⅱ玻璃离子(实验组)和普通玻璃离子材(对照组)进行修复,观察修复后半年、一年和两年的充填效果。结果:富士Ⅱ玻璃离子和普通玻璃离子充填材料的成功率0.5年分别为98.1 5%、87.04%;1年分别为93.83%、71.25%;2年分别为89.38%、58.60%,修复后0.5年、1年、2年相比差异均有有显著性,(P<0.01)。结论:富士Ⅱ玻璃离子充填材料修复楔状缺损效果好,是充填楔状缺损较理想的材料。Objective: To compare the clinical effect of GC Fuji Ⅱ glass-ionomer cement and ordinary glass-ionomer cement for repairing wedge-shaped defects. Methods: Totally 58 teeth were randomly divided into 2 groups, and filled by GC Fuji Ⅱ glass-ionomer cement (experimental group) and ordinary glass-ionomer cement (control group) respectively, which was to compare the clinical effect after 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Results: With 0.5 years, the successful rates for both GC Fuji Ⅱ glass-ionomer cement and ordinary glass-ionomer cement are 98.15%, 87.04 respectively; with i year, 93.83%, 71.25; with 2 years, 89.38%, 58.60%, there were significant difference if compared after either 0.5 years, 1 year or 2 years (P〈 0.01). Conclusion: It exhibits GC Fuji Ⅱ supior effects to ordinary glass-ionomer cement, that is a relatively ideal restorative material.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3