行政审判中的司法建议制度运行分析——以江苏法院为视角  

Analysis on Judicial Advice System Application to Administrative Adjudication——From Aspect of Jiangsu Court

作　　者：黄学贤[1] 丁钰[2] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学法学院 [2]江苏省高级人民法院

出　　处：《行政法学研究》2011年第3期86-91,共6页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目<行政诉讼法的修改>阶段性成果(项目编号:2006JDXM253)

摘　　要：在行政审判中,司法建议应当严格明确以行政行为存续力为效力范围,禁止法院直接以司法建议方式对进入诉讼的行政行为进行具体指导,在处理与行政判决的关系上,应当坚持行政判决的最终既判力。未来司法建议制度必须从文书制作、反馈机制、法律责任、信息公开等方面作出规范。In administrative adjudication, the validity scope of the judicial advice should be strictly and clearly limited to the existence force of administrative acts in order to forbid the court from guiding specifically the administrative acts involving in litigations by direct judicial advice, and, when balancing its relationship with administrative judgment, the end res judicata of the later should be supported. Moreover, more regulations should be done to judicial advice system in future, including document making, feedback mechanism and legal liability as well as information publicity.

关 键 词：行政诉讼 司法建议 司法能动 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]