论中国刑事司法程序异化的实践现状——基于典型案例的实证反思  

The Practical Face of Chinese Criminal Justice: An Empirical Study of 90 Criminal Cases

作　　者：林喜芬[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院,上海200240

出　　处：《上海交通大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2011年第4期41-49,共9页Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目(10AFX003)

摘　　要：通过对90起典型误判案件的经验分析,发现转型中国的刑事司法在程序运行方面,具有"错误演化的重复性"、"辩护功能的次要性"等异化特征;在证据使用方面,具有"证据收集的非法性"、"证据效果的间接性"、"证据认定的随意性"等异化特征;在权利救济方面,具有"救济原因的偶然性"、"救济渠道的阻滞性"、"救济方式的博弈性"等异化特征。刑事司法程序的异化引发了"受害主体的多元性"、"危害程度的深远性"、"赔偿救济的有限性"等一系列不良后果。而这些异化现象,必须通过制度与条件的双重改进方可缓解。Through an empirical study of 90 typical criminal cases, it is found that Chinese criminal justice has some distorted factors in practice. With respect to process, judicial errors are usually overlooked in investigation, prosecution and trial, and defense effect is always subordinate, too. With respect to evidence, not only are the illegal obtained and irrelevant evidences very common, but also the affirmation of evidence is at random occasionally. With respect to remedy, the remedy of judicial errors are not only based on accidental reasons hut also affected hy many comp!icated factors beyond institution. In addition, judicial error brings great and far-reaching damages to a lot of victims, while giving limited compensations in China.

关 键 词：司法状况 程序异化 实践表征 典型案例 经验分析 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]