检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢晖[1]
机构地区:[1]襄樊学院经济与政法学院,湖北襄阳441053
出 处:《襄樊学院学报》2011年第7期50-55,共6页Journal of Xiangfan University
摘 要:控辩平等是现代刑事诉讼的原则之一,其目的在于正确定位控辩双方在诉讼中的地位和作用。依据该项原则,行使控诉权的控方与行使辩护权的辩方之间应当在诉讼地位平等、诉讼权利对等的基础上展开对抗活动。但我国目前由于侦查权力过大,犯罪嫌疑人权利受限过多,在控辩关系上呈现"一边倒"。因此,应当对控方的权力进行合理规制,赋予辩方更多的诉讼权利,从而缩小二者之间的差距,实现侦查阶段的控辩平等。Prosecution and defense equality is one of the principles of modern criminal procedure,which aims position the status and role of both parties.According to this principle,both the accuser and the defendant have rights to induce evidences and confront on the basis of equal litigation position and equal litigation right.Due to unfairly larger power of investigation authority and overly limited rights of criminal suspects,the prosecution enjoys overwhelming superiority.Therefore the power of the accuser should be reasonably regulated and more rights out of litigation should be granted to criminal suspects.Thus,the unbalanced relationship between the accuser and the defendant can be reduced,which may be helpful for realizing the equality between the two parties in investigation stage.
关 键 词:侦查阶段 控辩平等 《中华人民共和国律师法(2007)》
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222