检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省第二中医院口腔科,510095 [2]南方医科大学南方医院口腔科
出 处:《中国实用医药》2011年第22期27-28,共2页China Practical Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨光固化复合体Dyract在牙楔状缺损修复中的疗效。方法将120例楔状缺损患者(284颗患牙)随机分为Dyract组(153颗)和对照组(131颗),对照组患者采用光固化复合树脂充填,Dyract组患者采用Dyract复合体充填。经6~12个月复查。临床根据修复体、形态、临床症状等以判断疗效。结果治疗12个月后Dyract组有效率92.35%,对照组78.65%,Dyract组12例无效中修复体脱落8颗,折断3颗,继发牙髓炎2颗;对照组28例无效中脱落15颗,折断8颗,继发牙髓炎3颗,色泽改变2颗。两者临床疗效差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。USPHS评估系统分析则发现2组边缘密合度、边缘着色、修复体脱落方面均有明显差别(P<0.05)。结论采用光固化复合体修复楔状缺损较光固化复合树脂更理想,简便,容易操作,美观逼真,不变色,是修复楔状缺损的理想材料。Objective To investigate light-cured dental composite Dyract wedge-shaped defects in the results.Methods 120 patients with wedge-shaped defect patients(284 teeth) were randomly divided into Dyract group(153) and control group(131),the control group were treated with light-cured composite resin,Dyract group of patients with complex filled with Dyract.After 6~12 months later.According to restoration of clinical,morphological,clinical symptoms to determine efficacy.Results After 12 months Dyract group was 92.35% and the control group was 78.65%,Dyract in 12 cases of in effective restoration off 8 cases,broken 3 cases,secondary to pulpitis 2.In control group,28 cases were ineffective in shedding 15,broken 8,secondary to pulpitis 3,the color change 2 cases.Statistically significant difference between the clinical efficacy(P0.05).USPHS evaluation system analysis was found in Group 2 edge adaptation,edge coloring,body off restoration areas were significantly different(P0.05).Conclusion The light-cured composite wedge-shaped defect repair than the more desirable light-cured composite resin,simple,easy to operate,beautiful and realistic,not color,is an ideal material for wedge-shaped defect repair.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.189.186.244