检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河北省秦皇岛市第一医院眼科,河北秦皇岛066000 [2]河北医科大学第二医院眼科,河北石家庄050000
出 处:《河北医科大学学报》2011年第8期905-907,共3页Journal of Hebei Medical University
摘 要:目的观察视网膜黄斑分支静脉阻塞(macular branch retinal vein occlusion,MBRVO)激光治疗的效果。方法回顾性分析经荧光素眼底血管造影诊断为MBRVO合并黄斑水肿病例120例120眼的临床资料。结果复诊时激光治疗组视力≥0.8 30例占57.70%,视力≥0.5 19例占36.54%,视力≥0.2 3例占5.77%。非激光治疗组视力≥0.8 17例占25%,视力≥0.5 41例占60.29%,视力≥0.2 7例占10.29%,视力<0.2 3例占5.77%。治疗后2组视力差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 MBRVO激光治疗组效果明显优于非激光治疗组。Objective To observe the treatment effect of laser photocoagulation for the macular branch retinal vein occlusion (MBRVO). Methods Retrospective analysis of clinical data of 120 cases, 120 eyes which was diagnosed macular edema MBRVO with the fundus fluorescein angiography were retrospectively analyzed. Results When return visited, in laser treatment group vision of 30 cases ≥0.8, accounting for 57.70%. 19 cases ≥0.5, accounting for 36.54% ,3 cases ≥0.2, accounting for 5.77%. But in non - laser treatment group,the vision of 17 patients ≥0.8 ,accounting for 25% ,41 cases ≥0. 5, accounting for 60.29% ,7 cases ≥0.2, accounting for 10.29% ,3 cases 〈 0.2, accounting for 5.77%. The visions had significant statistical difference between two groups after treatment ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion The treatment effect of MBRVO in laser treatment group is better than non - laser treatment group.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38