检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁一枫[1] 李军[1] 谭飞[1] 葛和平[1] 茅冬俊[1]
出 处:《肿瘤基础与临床》2011年第4期329-331,共3页journal of basic and clinical oncology
摘 要:目的比较胸上段食管癌不同放疗计划的剂量学差异。方法对86例上段食管癌患者分别设计调强放疗(IMRT)和三维适形放疗(3DCRT)计划,利用剂量体积直方图来比较两种计划中靶区、危及器官的剂量学差异。结果与3DCRT相比,IMRT靶区覆盖率V95%更高,Dmean也更接近处方剂量,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);IMRT的靶区适合度指数、靶区剂量不均匀性指数均更接近1;IMRT脊髓D01明显降低,双肺受量略高。结论 IMRT用于治疗胸上段食管癌优于3DCRT。Objective To compare the dosimetry of different radiation therapy plans for upper esophageal carcinoma.Methods Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy(3DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT) were designed respectively for 86 patients with upper esophageal carcinoma.Dose volume histogram was used to compare the target volume and organs at risks.Results Compared with 3DCRT,the target volume coverage of IMRT was higher,the Dmean was more close to the prescription dose(P〈0.05);the conformity index and homogeneity index were more close to one,spinal cord′s D01 significantly reduced.Conclusion IMRT is better than 3DCRT for upper esophageal carcinoma.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200