检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙敏洁[1]
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学知识产权学院,湖北武汉430073
出 处:《兰州学刊》2011年第8期107-113,共7页
基 金:国家社科基金项目。(项目编号:09BFX036)
摘 要:在知识的淘金热中,业界多有采用合作研发新技术模式者。我国专利法未明确规定专利共有的性质,由此引发了相关的权属纷争。专利权实为专利财产权,除当事人另有约定外,原则上应为按份共有。共有专利权与共有人对专利权所享有的份额是两个不同的概念,在共享专利的语境中,共有人对共有专利权能的实施不受其所享有份额的影响。此外,企业合作研发共享专利者还可能与专利法上的职务发明相抵触,由于专利法缺乏相关规定,如有纠纷,只能以激励创新的立法宗旨为导向,综合考虑、个案解决。Knowledge of the gold rush in the industry have adopted more collaborative R & D of new technologies patterning. China's Patent Law does not specify the nature of the patent there, which led to disputes related to ownership. Real property rights for the patent, unless the parties otherwise a- greed, in principle, should be by shares. Total patents and patent owner of the share enjoyed by the two different concepts, the patent in the context of sharing, co - owner of the patent to the implementation of total enjoyment from their share of influence. In addition, R & D Cooperation could also share the patent on the patent law and contravene the invention, due to the lack of the relevant provisions of the Patent Law, where disputes can only be the leg- islative intent of encouraging innovation - oriented, comprehensive consideration of the case resolved.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117