试论教师教育权的强制性及其实践意义  

On the Mandatory Nature of Teacher's Right to Education and Its Practical Significance

作　　者：蒋淑波[1] 

机构地区：[1]大庆师范学院法学院,黑龙江大庆163712

出　　处：《大庆师范学院学报》2011年第5期29-31,共3页Journal of Daqing Normal University

摘　　要：教育实践和教师教育权的结构与性质决定,必须在法理上明确教师教育权对相对人具有强制性。从认识到制度层面分析,体罚、心罚或教师怠于管理都是对教师教育权强制性的误读及制度设计上的缺陷所致,教师教育权强制性的缺失也有悖于权利与义务辩证统一的基本法理。教师教育权具有公权力性质,是法定的专业职务权力,这也决定教师教育权具有强制性。Concerning the educational practice and analysis of the nature and composition of teacher＇s right to education, we believe that teacher＇s right to education for counterpart must be definitely mandatory in law. From the perspectives of conception and institution, physical and mental punishment or remiss in management are caused by misunderstanding of the mandatory nature of teacher~ right to education and defects in institution de- sign. Lacking of the mandatory is contrary to the basic legal principle of dialectical unity between rights and obligations. Teacher＇s right to education is a public power in nature and statutory power in professional positions, so it is of mandatory nature.

关 键 词：教师教育权 相对人 公权力性质 强制性 

分 类 号：D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]