检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]郑州大学体育学院,河南郑州450001 [2]河南大学体育学院,河南开封475001
出 处:《北京体育大学学报》2011年第8期129-131,共3页Journal of Beijing Sport University
摘 要:运用录象观察、专家访谈和逻辑分析等研究方法,对目前国际大级别散打运动员和我国大级别运动员摔法技术运用现状进行了对比分析。研究表明:目前国内外大级别运动员摔法运用基本接近,散打摔法技术逐步趋于稳定、成熟,但国外选手的摔法技术已经成为其得分的重要手段。特别是在近身摔法上,国外运动员更为突出,是其比赛中重要的取胜手段;在接腿摔上中外运动员基本接近,但接腿切摔上国外选手优于国内选手。Using the research methods of video observation,expert interview,logic analysis,etc,the paper compares the actual utilization of the techniques between the international Sanda athletes at high-weight level and the high-weight level athletes of China.The research shows:At present,the technique using of major domestic Sanda athletes is basically the same.Sanda wrestling techniques gradually become stable.However,wrestling techniques has become important means of scoring in competition.Especially in near body wrestling,foreign players are more prominent.The throwing technique is basically the same.But foreign players are better than domestic players in throwing technique.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3