惯习与会话准则反思  

Habitus and Conversational Maxims: A Reflection

作　　者：姚晓东[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京林业大学外语学院

出　　处：《山东外语教学》2011年第4期9-14,共6页Shandong Foreign Language Teaching

基　　金：北京林业大学青年科技启动基金资助(项目编号:2010BLX21);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(项目编号:RW2011-25)

摘　　要：Levinson认为Grice的会话准则与Bourdieu的惯习概念是同一路的。研究对此进行批评性反思，指出二者有本质的不同，在深层假设、性质和约束力各方面都有不同表现，差异大于共性，而不像kvinson所说的二者性质相同，前者比后者明晰。惯习反倒是与Grice的禀性概念接近。A critical analysis is conducted to delineate the similarities and differences between Griee＇s notion of conversational maxims and Bourdieu＇s habitus. It shows, unlike Levinson＇ s claim that the two are of a similar kind of beast with the former more distinct than the latter, the two differ in essential ways： the basic hypothesis, features and restrictive powers. Habitus is, comparatively, closer to Grice＇ s notion of propension.

关 键 词：惯习 会话准则 禀性 

分 类 号：H03[语言文字—语言学]