检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河北工业大学电磁场与电器可靠性省部共建重点实验室,天津300130 [2]石家庄职业技术学院信息工程系,050081
出 处:《国际生物医学工程杂志》2011年第4期209-211,231,共4页International Journal of Biomedical Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(60975001)
摘 要:目的研究基于视觉、听觉以及视听融合感知的刺激源对脑电(WEG)识别率的影响。方法试验分别从视觉、听觉和视听融合3种情况提供与交通环境相关的刺激源,在不同刺激源的提示下,受试者利用左右手想象运动对车辆进行启动和制动控制,并对采集的脑电数据进行特征提取和分类处理,得到与想象运动相关的c3、c4导联上的特征信号和分类结果。结果视觉、听觉、视听融合环境下5名受试者最高识别率分别为100%、100%、83.3%,平均识别率分别为68.8%、82.2%、76.9%。结论基于视听感官的刺激源对脑电的识别率有一定影响,并且存在较大的个体差异。Objective To evaluate the effect of electroencephalography(EEG) recognition rate resulted by stimulus of visual, auditory and combined perception. Methods In virtual traffie environment, the stimuli were designed in traffic information based on visual, auditory and audio-visual fusion. When one of the three stim- uli appeared, the subjects completed starting and braking vehicle by imaginary using of right and left hands at the same time. The EEG signals were recorded and the imaginary motion-related features from C3, C4 were extracted and classified. Results The best recognition rates in visual, auditory and fusion perception were 100%, 100% and 83%, respectively, while the averages of the rates were 68.8%,82.2% ,76.9%, respectively. Conclusion The recognition rates are affected by the audio, visual and fusion stimulus and apparent individual differences exist.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117