论20世纪50-70年代爱欲叙述中的性别政治  

Narrative of Love and Desire in the Gender Politics of 1950's-1970's

作　　者：刘传霞[1] 

机构地区：[1]济南大学文学院,山东济南250022

出　　处：《妇女研究论丛》2011年第5期78-84,共7页Journal of Chinese Women＇s Studies

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目"中国当代文学身体政治研究"研究成果之一;项目批准号:09YJA751036

摘　　要：在中国革命胜利之后,为了社会秩序稳定,也为了聚拢、集结人们全部身体力量为革命建设服务,国家意识形态加强了对爱欲的管束与治理,革命伦理建立了压抑个人爱欲快感、崇尚奉献牺牲的革命爱欲观。然而,从性别政治角度考察,不论是"十七年"时期压抑爱欲的革命文学叙述,还是文革时期彻底剔除爱欲的激进文学叙述,写作者的性别立场仍潜在规约与影响着文本对男女两性性别角色的认知和建构。男作家的革命文本叙述也隐含着男性中心主义文化立场,而女作家的革命文本却在革命规范之内做着隐蔽的突破,试图为女性解放找寻合理路径,为女性寻求更加开阔的生存空间。After the triumph of the revolution, to maintain social order and stability and as well, to gather and concentrate physical ef- forts in serving revolutionary construction, State ideology intensified infiltration and control of individual＇s love life and desire. Revolutionary ethics proposed to suppress love and personal pleasure and advocated desire and sacrifice for revolution. However, from a perspective of gender politics, whether in revolutionary literary narrative of suppressing love and desire during ＂the 17 years＂, or in radical literary narrative completely removing love and desire during the Cultural Revolution period, the gender position of a writer and his/her tacit value judgment would still likely affected his/her understanding of gender roles and the construction of both sexes in writing. Es- pecially, male writers＇ description in revolutionary texts might take a male-centered position, while women writers might have made subtle breakthroughs within the bound of revolutionary stipulations, attempting to find reasonable path for women emancipation and to seek a more open space for women.

关 键 词：叙述模式 性别政治 爱欲 

分 类 号：I206.7[文学—中国文学]