行动正当性的美德伦理论证及其现代性困境——以赫斯特豪斯美德伦理为中心的展开  

Rightness of Action from Virtue Ethics and its Modernistic Dilemma——On the Case of Hursthouse

作　　者：童建军[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学社会科学教育学院,广东广州510275

出　　处：《华中科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第5期10-14,20,共6页Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：教育部社科研究青年基金项目资助(10YJC720037);广东省哲学社会科学"十一五"规划项目资助(GD10YMK03);广东省教育厅思想政治教育重点资助课题(2010zz001)

摘　　要：为回应美德伦理无法为行动提供具体指导的诘难,新西兰伦理学家赫斯特豪斯提出了以行为者为基础的"合格的行动者"的美德伦理理论,认为在为行动提供形式指导上,美德伦理与以功利主义和康德式伦理学为代表的规范伦理学并无重大差异。但是,这种理论同样受到批评与质疑。通过对赫斯特豪斯美德伦理的分析,认为美德伦理之所以无法独立料理现代社会,其根本原因在于其对"值得的"生活状态共识的依赖。因此,当社会结构由传统向现代变迁后,美德伦理的要求就成为一种文化乡愁。In response to the criticism that virtue can′t afford specific guidance on action,Hursthouse brings about a type of virtue ethics theory which is named qualified agent theory.She believes that there is no difference between virtue ethics and normative ethics dominated by Utilitarianism and Kant′s moral philosophy in affording formal guidance on action.But her theory has been criticized a lot too.The paper argues that the reason,why virtue ethics can′t deal with modern society independently,is that it relies on the consensus of worthwhile on life.So when social structure has changed from tradition to modernity,the order from virtue ethics becomes a kind of culture nostalgia.

关 键 词：美德伦理 困境 行动正当性 赫斯特豪斯 

分 类 号：B82-06[哲学宗教—伦理学]